The identification of target companies for innovation transfer and technology monetization/commercialization requires sophisticated use of patent big data. For example, a transferred target company needs special circumstances such as i) strong dependence/relatedness to the patent set being transferred, ii) money, such as spending money, having money, or having money, and iii) being in a dire situation such as patent litigations or trials.
Companies related to purchased patents include i) companies that have purchased patents, ii) companies that have transferred patents through M&A, iii) companies that have received patent practice rights (licenses), iv) companies that have acquired technology companies, and v) companies that have invested in or received investments from technology companies.
Of course, i) specialized companies that are focused on a particular field (have an eye for the value of patents), ii) rapidly growing companies that are rapidly growing their patent portfolio (are spending money), or iii) new companies that are new to a particular field (usually have money) can also be effective targets.
https://whimsical.com/2-1-en-EtKWhmfEFr9wYBYL17WScr
Using the Augmented Reality (AR; AR glass) field as an example, PatentPia GoldenCompass provides contents for finding innovation transfer/technology monetization/commercialization of target companies on a global scale. If you click on the chain(link) marks that are attached to each item in the above utilization map, the example page will open in a new window.
For each specific demanding company i, a set of patents in possession of a specific university/performer i should be customized and packaged and provided to company i.
In the examples below are, only the Motorola patents used to reject the patents of Google out of the 5,100 patents in possession of Motorola. In other words, out of the 5,100 patents in possession of Motorola, there are only a few patents that have an interest(rejection relationship) with a specific company i. This very small packaged patent set has a big significance for a specific company i (because of the preceding patents of KAIST, their patent application is prevented from being registered due to lack of novelty or non-obviousness).
On the other hand, apart from the patent sets delivered to a specific company i (e.g., Google), the data on the relevance of these patent sets to the competing companies of a specific company i should also be provided. This way, the business personnel or decision makers of a specific company i can directly recognize that there is a risk that the Motorola patent sets that are closely related to a specific company i may fall into the hands of their competing companies if the specific company i does not engage in patent purchases, etc.
In addition, the Motorola patent sets closely related to a particular company i need to be provided to the company i's agent (IP law firm, patent attorney, etc.) or technology intermediary company/organization. These representatives or intermediary companies/organizations are likely to leverage the nation's/public's IP transfer programs/funding organizations to get the technology transfer to the specific company i. (Sophisticated targeting/packaging + emphasis on the risks of not receiving the technology transfer, etc.)